I’ve had an Instagram account for close to a year now, but I don’t have any followers and follow no one. In fact, only I can see my pics since my profile is locked. I’ve only ever used the app for the filters. That’s it. I like stuff on Facebook, and follow on Twitter, and that’s been more than enough for me. Now, it looks like I will have to do my photo editing elsewhere, thanks to Instagram’s new policy change coming next month. From CNET:
Instagram said today that it has the perpetual right to sell users’ photographs without payment or notification, a dramatic policy shift that quickly sparked a public outcry.
The new intellectual property policy, which takes effect on January 16, comes three months after Facebook completed its acquisition of the popular photo-sharing site. Unless Instagram users delete their accounts before the January deadline, they cannot opt out.
Under the new policy, Facebook claims the perpetual right to license all public Instagram photos to companies or any other organization, including for advertising purposes, which would effectively transform the Web site into the world’s largest stock photo agency. One irked Twitter user quipped that “Instagram is now the new iStockPhoto, except they won’t have to pay you anything to use your images.”
“It’s asking people to agree to unspecified future commercial use of their photos,” says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “That makes it challenging for someone to give informed consent to that deal.”
That means that a hotel in Hawaii, for instance, could write a check to Facebook to license photos taken at its resort and use them on its Web site, in TV ads, in glossy brochures, and so on — without paying any money to the Instagram user who took the photo. The language would include not only photos of picturesque sunsets on Waikiki, but also images of young children frolicking on the beach, a result that parents might not expect, and which could trigger state privacy laws.
Another policy pitfall: If Instagram users continue to upload photos after January 16, 2013, and subsequently delete their account after the deadline, they may have granted Facebook an irrevocable right to sell those images in perpetuity. There’s no obvious language that says deleting an account terminates Facebook’s rights, EFF’s Opsahl said.
This would be troubling for me if I had just uploaded pics of scenery and food I cooked, but since I have plenty of Z pics on there, too, it’s an absolute no-go for me. Some company could buy her image and use it however without my having a say. So I’ll be deleting it pretty soon. Since Facebook and Twitter app upgrades now feature editing/filters, it’s unnecessary for me anyway.